game: heads-up hold'em
24 hands of no-limit Texas hold'em, 100 big blinds deep. Most chips at the end wins. Played without a human in the loop between the minds of $LEDGER and $NIT.
s04_r075_m5_holdem_LEDGER_vs_NIT.txt
transcript
8♠︎ K♦︎, btn. eq 56% vs random. open 50.
▸ raises to 50
J♣︎ 4♠︎ on the big blind. About 46% against a random hand. The price is right: 30 more into 40. I call.
▸ calls 30
I have a small pair on 6♥︎ T♥︎ 4♥︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
king high on 6♥︎ T♥︎ 4♥︎. eq 42%. checked to. ~42%. check back.
▸ checks
I have a small pair on 6♥︎ T♥︎ 4♥︎ A♦︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
no pair on 6♥︎ T♥︎ 4♥︎ A♦︎. eq 34%. checked to. ~34%. check back.
▸ checks
I have a pair of fours and the board's pair on 6♥︎ T♥︎ 4♥︎ A♦︎ A♠︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
only the board's pair on 6♥︎ T♥︎ 4♥︎ A♦︎ A♠︎. eq 48%. checked to. ~48%. check back.
▸ checks
9♦︎ 8♥︎ on the button. About 50% against a random hand. Nothing here worth another 10 chips. Fold.
▸ folds
5♥︎ 2♥︎, btn. eq 40% vs random. bottom of range. fold.
▸ folds
7♦︎ 8♣︎ on the button. About 46% against a random hand. Not worth a raise, not bad enough to fold. I complete the blind.
▸ calls 10
5♣︎ 9♠︎, bb. eq 44% vs random. free flop. check.
▸ checks
second pair on T♠︎ 3♥︎ 5♠︎. eq 56%. thin value / protection. bet 20.
▸ bets 20
I have no pair on T♠︎ 3♥︎ 5♠︎. $LEDGER bet 20 and I do not beat enough of what bets that size. Fold.
▸ folds
5♠︎ T♣︎, btn. eq 47% vs random. marginal. limp, see a flop cheap.
▸ calls 10
5♥︎ 2♦︎ on the big blind. About 36% against a random hand. I take the free flop.
▸ checks
I have no pair on 9♥︎ 4♠︎ K♥︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
no pair on 9♥︎ 4♠︎ K♥︎. eq 39%. checked to. ~39%. check back.
▸ checks
I have a small pair on 9♥︎ 4♠︎ K♥︎ 5♦︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
a small pair on 9♥︎ 4♠︎ K♥︎ 5♦︎. eq 41%. checked to. ~41%. check back.
▸ checks
I have a pair of fives and the board's pair on 9♥︎ 4♠︎ K♥︎ 5♦︎ K♠︎. Worse hands call here. I bet 25 into 40.
▸ bets 25
a pair of fives and the board's pair on 9♥︎ 4♠︎ K♥︎ 5♦︎ K♠︎. eq 78%. 25 into 40: need 28%, est 63%. call.
▸ calls 25
Q♦︎ 4♦︎ on the button. About 52% against a random hand. So far $LEDGER has folded to 25% of the bets it faced. Not worth a raise, not bad enough to fold. I complete the blind.
▸ calls 10
9♣︎ 4♣︎, bb. eq 45% vs random. free flop. check.
▸ checks
top pair on 9♦︎ 6♦︎ 2♥︎. eq 72%. ~72% to be ahead. bet 25 into 40 for value.
▸ bets 25
I have a flush draw on 9♦︎ 6♦︎ 2♥︎. I need 28% to call 25, and I estimate 41% against hands that bet this way. Call.
▸ calls 25
second pair on 9♦︎ 6♦︎ 2♥︎ Q♣︎. eq 64%. ~64%: showdown value, not betting value. check.
▸ checks
I have top pair on 9♦︎ 6♦︎ 2♥︎ Q♣︎. So far $LEDGER has folded to 25% of the bets it faced. I am ahead of most of what continues. 55 into 90.
▸ bets 55
second pair on 9♦︎ 6♦︎ 2♥︎ Q♣︎. eq 64%. 55 into 90: need 28%, est 49%. call.
▸ calls 55
second pair on 9♦︎ 6♦︎ 2♥︎ Q♣︎ 3♣︎. eq 81%. ~79% to be ahead. bet 120 into 200 for value.
▸ bets 120
I have top pair on 9♦︎ 6♦︎ 2♥︎ Q♣︎ 3♣︎. So far $LEDGER has folded to 20% of the bets it faced. I need 27% to call 120, and I estimate 72% against hands that bet this way. Call.
▸ calls 120
J♥︎ 4♥︎, btn. eq 48% vs random. bottom of range. fold.
▸ folds
T♠︎ K♠︎ on the button. About 63% against a random hand. A standard open to 50.
▸ raises to 50
T♦︎ 7♠︎, bb. eq 47% vs random. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~43%. call.
▸ calls 30
top pair on 4♠︎ 8♦︎ T♥︎. eq 77%. ~75% to be ahead. bet 60 into 100 for value.
▸ bets 60
I have top pair on 4♠︎ 8♦︎ T♥︎. I need 27% to call 60, and I estimate 69% against hands that bet this way. Call.
▸ calls 60
top pair on 4♠︎ 8♦︎ T♥︎ 2♣︎. eq 86%. ~84% to be ahead. bet 135 into 220 for value.
▸ bets 135
I have top pair on 4♠︎ 8♦︎ T♥︎ 2♣︎. I need 28% to call 135, and I estimate 68% against hands that bet this way. Call.
▸ calls 135
second pair on 4♠︎ 8♦︎ T♥︎ 2♣︎ Q♥︎. eq 77%. ~75% to be ahead. bet 300 into 490 for value.
▸ bets 300
I have second pair on 4♠︎ 8♦︎ T♥︎ 2♣︎ Q♥︎. I need 28% to call 300, and I estimate 61% against hands that bet this way. Call.
▸ calls 300
3♣︎ T♦︎, btn. eq 43% vs random. bottom of range. fold.
▸ folds
9♣︎ 7♣︎ on the button. About 53% against a random hand. I raise to 50 and take the lead.
▸ raises to 50
8♥︎ 2♦︎, bb. eq 36% vs random. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~31% vs a raising range. fold.
▸ folds
4♣︎ 4♠︎, btn. eq 60% vs random. in range. raise 50.
▸ raises to 50
4♥︎ 6♥︎ on the big blind. About 40% against a random hand. $LEDGER raised and this does not hold up against a raising range. I let it go.
▸ folds
5♦︎ 8♦︎ on the button. About 43% against a random hand. Nothing here worth another 10 chips. Fold.
▸ folds
6♥︎ 5♥︎, btn. eq 44% vs random. marginal. limp, see a flop cheap.
▸ calls 10
6♣︎ 2♠︎ on the big blind. About 34% against a random hand. So far $LEDGER has folded to 36% of the bets it faced. I take the free flop.
▸ checks
I have no pair on A♥︎ 3♦︎ T♦︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
no pair on A♥︎ 3♦︎ T♦︎. eq 16%. checked to. ~16%. check back.
▸ checks
I have no pair on A♥︎ 3♦︎ T♦︎ 9♠︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
no pair on A♥︎ 3♦︎ T♦︎ 9♠︎. eq 15%. $NIT: folds 29% to bets, aggression 19%. checked to. ~15%. check back.
▸ checks
I have no pair on A♥︎ 3♦︎ T♦︎ 9♠︎ J♥︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
no pair on A♥︎ 3♦︎ T♦︎ 9♠︎ J♥︎. eq 3%. $NIT: folds 29% to bets, aggression 18%. checked to. ~3%. check back.
▸ checks
3♦︎ 4♣︎ on the button. About 30% against a random hand. Nothing here worth another 10 chips. Fold.
▸ folds
7♥︎ 9♦︎, btn. eq 49% vs random. in range. raise 50.
▸ raises to 50
3♣︎ 9♠︎ on the big blind. About 39% against a random hand. So far $LEDGER has folded to 33% of the bets it faced. $LEDGER raised and this does not hold up against a raising range. I let it go.
▸ folds
8♥︎ J♣︎ on the button. About 51% against a random hand. Not worth a raise, not bad enough to fold. I complete the blind.
▸ calls 10
Q♣︎ 6♥︎, bb. eq 48% vs random. $NIT: folds 35% to bets, aggression 17%. free flop. check.
▸ checks
no pair on 8♠︎ K♠︎ 9♦︎. eq 40%. no fold equity worth paying for. check.
▸ checks
I have a small pair on 8♠︎ K♠︎ 9♦︎. $LEDGER checked. I take the free card rather than open the betting.
▸ checks
only the board's pair on 8♠︎ K♠︎ 9♦︎ 9♠︎. eq 30%. $NIT: folds 35% to bets, aggression 17%. no fold equity worth paying for. check.
▸ checks
I have a pair of eights and the board's pair on 8♠︎ K♠︎ 9♦︎ 9♠︎. So far $LEDGER has folded to 33% of the bets it faced. $LEDGER checked. I take the free card rather than open the betting.
▸ checks
only the board's pair on 8♠︎ K♠︎ 9♦︎ 9♠︎ 5♦︎. eq 31%. no fold equity worth paying for. check.
▸ checks
I have a pair of eights and the board's pair on 8♠︎ K♠︎ 9♦︎ 9♠︎ 5♦︎. A small bet of 20. I am ahead often enough, and it denies a free card.
▸ bets 20
only the board's pair on 8♠︎ K♠︎ 9♦︎ 9♠︎ 5♦︎. eq 31%. need 25%, est 19% vs range. fold.
▸ folds
A♠︎ 3♥︎, btn. eq 59% vs random. in range. raise 50.
▸ raises to 50
J♠︎ 7♦︎ on the big blind. About 50% against a random hand. The price is right: 30 more into 40. I call.
▸ calls 30
I have straight, jack high on 9♥︎ T♣︎ 8♥︎. I am far ahead. A bet only folds out hands I beat, so I check and let $LEDGER catch up or bluff.
▸ checks
ace high on 9♥︎ T♣︎ 8♥︎. eq 36%. checked to. ~36%. check back.
▸ checks
I have straight, jack high on 9♥︎ T♣︎ 8♥︎ 8♣︎. I am ahead of most of what continues. 75 into 100.
▸ bets 75
only the board's pair on 9♥︎ T♣︎ 8♥︎ 8♣︎. eq 51%. need 30%, est 35% vs range. fold.
▸ folds
7♥︎ T♣︎ on the button. About 47% against a random hand. So far $LEDGER has folded to 40% of the bets it faced. Nothing here worth another 10 chips. Fold.
▸ folds
Q♦︎ 4♥︎, btn. eq 49% vs random. open 50.
▸ raises to 50
J♦︎ 6♠︎ on the big blind. About 46% against a random hand. The price is right: 30 more into 40. I call.
▸ calls 30
I have no pair on 5♦︎ 3♣︎ A♠︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
no pair on 5♦︎ 3♣︎ A♠︎. eq 54%. checked to. ~54%. check back.
▸ checks
I have second pair on 5♦︎ 3♣︎ A♠︎ J♠︎. Nothing to gain by betting here. I check.
▸ checks
no pair on 5♦︎ 3♣︎ A♠︎ J♠︎. eq 28%. checked to. ~28%. check back.
▸ checks
I have second pair on 5♦︎ 3♣︎ A♠︎ J♠︎ 2♣︎. A small bet of 40. I am ahead often enough, and it denies a free card.
▸ bets 40
straight, five high on 5♦︎ 3♣︎ A♠︎ J♠︎ 2♣︎. eq 94%. 40 into 100: need 22%, est 83%. call.
▸ calls 40
Q♥︎ T♣︎ on the button. About 56% against a random hand. I raise to 50 and take the lead.
▸ raises to 50
8♣︎ 2♦︎, bb. eq 36% vs random. 30 to call, need 30%, have ~31% vs a raising range. fold.
▸ folds
T♥︎ 5♦︎, btn. eq 47% vs random. $NIT: folds 33% to bets, aggression 24%. bottom of range. fold.
▸ folds
2♠︎ 3♥︎ on the button. About 33% against a random hand. Nothing here worth another 10 chips. Fold.
▸ folds
7♣︎ 6♥︎, btn. eq 41% vs random. bottom of range. fold.
▸ folds
2♦︎ K♥︎ on the button. About 52% against a random hand. Nothing here worth another 10 chips. Fold.
▸ folds